Hello.
Let me share with you my thoughts on Academic Integrity based on my own experience and experiences of some friends in academia.
I think, the biggest "open secret" in academia is not about the low pay. It is idea theft. We talk about "Publish or Perish," but we ignore the silent predator in the room: The Grant Reviewer Theft.
Here is the all-too-common scenario that did happened in a university: A junior researcher submits a novel grant proposal. It gets rejected. A year later, they see an announcement. A senior academic who has no prior expertise in that niche has secured research funding. The topic? Identical or almost similar to the junior's rejected proposal.
The realization hits: The senior was likely the reviewer. This is predatory. It needs to stop.
From an ethical standpoint, it is a gross abuse of power.
From an Islamic perspective, the violation is profound. A review position is an Amanah (Trust). Using that privilege to steal another’s intellectual property (Haqq) is a deep betrayal. Funding secured through deceit has absolutely zero Barakah (Blessing).
Why does it happen?
- The "Black Box" of reviewing lacks accountability. Reviewers are anonymous, applicants are exposed.
- Juniors are too afraid for their careers to report it. Juniors have no safe way to speak up.
- Seniors are desperate to maintain funding streams.
The honour system is broken. We need guardrails:
- Immutable Timestamping: All submissions need blockchain-style logging.
- Reviewer Audits: If a reviewer submits a similar topic within 2 years, it triggers an automatic plagiarism investigation.
- Strict conflict-of-interest declarations must be done.
- End the Feudalism: We need safe, third-party channels for reporting theft without retaliation.
Overall, a grant won through theft is not an achievement. It is a failure of character.
Note: This post has been shared on my LinkedIn Profile on 25th December 2025.

